Skip to main content
· 12/12/2014

Russell v. Harman International Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 413 U.S. App. D.C. 235
  • 773 F.3d 253
  • 90 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 671
  • 59 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1922
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23359
  • 2014 WL 6996138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \A district court's\ error \does not constitute reversible error if it did not prejudice the parties.\
  • “A district court’s” error “does not constitute reversible error if it did not prejudice the parties.”
  • arguments made for the first time in a reply brief are forfeited
  • argument not raised in opening brief on appeal is forfeited
  • argument not raised in opening brief on appeal is forfeited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffith, Henderson, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.