· 1/23/1984

Santiago Amaro v. The Continental Can Company

Citations

724 F.2d 747
5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1215
1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26194
100 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 10,849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“There is no internal appeal procedure either mandated or recommended by ERISA to hear ... claims [alleging violations of protections guaranteed by ERISA].”
exhaustion not required for § 510 claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Skopil, Pre-Gerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.