Eleventh Circuit· 5/26/2010

United States v. Wright

Citations

607 F.3d 708
2010 WL 2089257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “[c]ommentary in the Guidelines Manual that interprets or explains a guideline is authoritative” unless it is unlawful
“Commentary in the Guidelines Manual that interprets or explains a guideline is authoritative unless it violates the Constitution or a federal statute, or is inconsistent with, or a plainly erroneous reading of, that guideline.”
involving a challenge to § 922(g)(1) on Commerce Clause grounds
reviewing an unpreserved constitutional challenge for plain error
applying plain-error review to Commerce Clause challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pryor, Fay, Quist

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Wright

264 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.