Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 9/30/1999

United States v. Wright

Citations

52 M.J. 136
1999 CAAF LEXIS 1266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that recusal was not necessary based on military judge’s “past [pro- fessional] relationship with” a law enforcement witness
“[D]espite an objective standard, the judge’s statements concerning his intentions and the matters upon which he will rely are not irrelevant to the inquiry.”
“[D]espite an objective standard, the judge’s statements concerning his intentions and the matters upon which he will rely are not irrelevant to the inquiry.”
first citing Ward v. Village of Mon- roeville, 409 U.S. 57 (1972); and then citing Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927)
“RCM 902(a) is assessed not in the mind of the military judge himself, but ‘rather in the mind of a reasonable man ....’”
first citing Ward v. Village of Mon- roeville, 409 U.S. 57 (1972); and then citing Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crawford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.