United States v. Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali Rehaif

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a similar Idaho nonwaiver provision “clearly states a strong public policy” based on the contrived distinction that the Idaho statute actually uses the words “public policy”
• holding that Bremen remains 16 good law in determining what constitutes an “exceptional reason” or “extraordinary circumstances” 17 under Atlantic Marine
• holding that Bremen remains good law 27 in determining what constitutes an “exceptional reason” or “extraordinary circumstances” under Atlantic Marine
• holding that Bremen remains good law 27 in determining what constitutes an “exceptional reason” or “extraordinary circumstances” under Atlantic Marine
• recognizing that under federal law, a forum-selection clause is controlling absent a strong showing that “enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought, whether declared by statute or by judicial decision”
• noting that “only four 12 other states,” not including California, have comparable statutes to Idaho, and explaining 13 that such exceptions are “bound to be far from routine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).