United States v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The government’s election to charge each of the four ‘particulars’ in the appellant's two false official statements as a separate specification was an unreasonable multiplication of charges which must be corrected.”
• “The government’s election to charge each of the four ‘particulars’ in the appellant's two false official statements as a separate specification was an unreasonable multiplication of charges which must be corrected.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Quiroz
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2000-03-29· cited 44×
• United States v. Quiroz
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2002-07-31· cited 23×
• United States v. Joyce
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 1999-02-10· cited 6×
• United States v. Ray
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 1999-07-06· cited 5×
• United States v. Private E1 HUNTER J. ISRAEL
  Army Court of Criminal Appeals· 2015-12-18

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Grostefon
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1982-03-22· cited 2,786×
• United States v. Teters
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1993-08-12· cited 237×
• United States v. Foster
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1994-08-19· cited 168×
• United States v. Pierce
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1989-02-21· cited 139×
• United States v. Claxton
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1991-03-27· cited 136×
• United States v. Morrison
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1995-04-07· cited 42×
• United States v. Sanchez
  U.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1993-12-28· cited 5×