Skip to main content
· 6/6/2006

United States v. Lesmarge Valnor

Citations

  • 451 F.3d 744
  • 2006 WL 1529118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering that a sentence was “appreciably below the length of the statutory maximum” in assessing its reasonableness
  • upholding a sentence as reasonable in part because it was appreciably below the statutory maximum
  • affirming an upward variance in part because the ultimate sentence was appreciably below the statutory maximum sentence
  • affirming a sentence as reasonable in part because it was well below the statutory maximum
  • affirming upward variance despite government and de- fendant jointly recommending sentence at low end of guideline range
  • affirming upward variance despite government and defendant jointly recommending sentence at low end of guideline range

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Hull, Marcus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.