Skip to main content
First Circuit· 9/23/2009

United States v. Wright

Citations

  • 582 F.3d 199
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20976
  • 2009 WL 3019695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that officers had reasonable suspicion where defendant leaned forward in the back seat of a car, quickly exited as if recognizing an unmarked car as a police car, ran in the opposite direction, clutched at his side, and refused to stop when commanded
  • accepting parties' agreement that seizure requiring reasonable suspicion did not occur until officers caught up with fleeing defendant and physically restrained him
  • accepting parties’ agreement that seizure requiring reasonable suspicion did not occur until officers caught up with fleeing defendant and physically restrained him
  • finding an investigative stop reasonable after a man ran from the police while clutching at his waistband
  • “[A] Terry stop is permitted even if the conduct justifying the stop was ambiguous and susceptible of an innocent explanation.... [T]he very purpose of [Terry] stops is to clarify ambiguous situations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.