Third Circuit· 1/4/2012
United States v. Wright
Citations
- 665 F.3d 560
- 2012 WL 10929
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 55
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining honest services fraud in the context of a bribery theory
- vacating counts of conviction for traditional mail fraud due to prejudicial spillover where “much of the evidence at this trial [for honest services fraud and traditional mail fraud] would be inadmissible at a hypothetical trial on traditional mail fraud alone”
- “The inducement from the official is criminal if it is implied from his words and actions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ambro, Chagares, Vanaskie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Joan Kedra v. Richard SchroeterThird Circuit· 2017-11-28· cited 217×
- United States v. BottiSecond Circuit· 2013-03-28· cited 100×
- United States v. William JeffersonFourth Circuit· 2012-03-26· cited 87×
- United States v. Ashley AndrewsThird Circuit· 2012-06-04· cited 86×
- United States v. Mark Ciavarella, Jr.Third Circuit· 2013-05-24· cited 86×
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Northfield Medical Center P.C.(076069) (Morris County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-05-04· cited 71×
- Klein v. MadisonE.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-04-10· cited 70×
- United States v. Gary SolomonSeventh Circuit· 2018-06-05· cited 63×
- United States v. McDonoughFirst Circuit· 2013-08-21· cited 43×
- United States v. Steven TerrySixth Circuit· 2013-02-14· cited 30×
- Francis v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2012-07-31· cited 20×
- In Re: Leon A. Kendall v.Third Circuit· 2013-04-03· cited 18×
- United States v. Christopher WrightThird Circuit· 2015-01-08· cited 15×
- United States v. CorreiaFirst Circuit· 2022-11-28· cited 15×
- United States v. Louis WillisThird Circuit· 2016-12-13· cited 14×
- United States v. Robert Harra, Jr.Third Circuit· 2021-01-12· cited 14×
- Prince v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2012-09-13· cited 14×
- Alexander v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2014-01-29· cited 12×
- James v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2013-12-12· cited 11×
- United States v. Lopez-MartinezFirst Circuit· 2021-04-07· cited 7×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 2,553×
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 987×
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 423×
- United States v. Michael DentThird Circuit· 1998-07-06· cited 399×
- Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court· 2008-12-02· cited 390×
- United States v. PungitoreThird Circuit· 1990-08-01· cited 355×
- United States v. Walter v. Cross, A/K/A Bobo Walter v. Cross, United States of America v. Jules C. MelograneThird Circuit· 2002-10-18· cited 283×
- United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1999-04-27· cited 229×
- United States v. Leonard A. PelulloThird Circuit· 1994-03-22· cited 229×
- United States v. KempThird Circuit· 2007-08-27· cited 210×
- United States v. Stefan E. BrodieThird Circuit· 2005-04-12· cited 189×
- United States v. JimenezThird Circuit· 2008-01-14· cited 183×
- United States v. LoreThird Circuit· 2005-12-02· cited 175×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1996-08-16· cited 161×
- UNITED STATES of America, v. Frank SERAFINI; United States of America, v. Frank SerafiniThird Circuit· 2000-12-01· cited 154×
- United States v. LeeThird Circuit· 2010-07-14· cited 137×
- United States v. Frank AnticoThird Circuit· 2001-11-28· cited 121×
- United States v. Tamika RileyThird Circuit· 2010-09-16· cited 120×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.