Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/26/1913

United States v. Wright

Citations

  • 229 U.S. 226
  • 33 S. Ct. 630
  • 57 L. Ed. 1160
  • 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2439

Syllabus

<p>In determining the effect of statutes regarding the introduction of liquor into Indian country, within the territorial limits of Oklahoma, every consideration arising out of the guardianship of the Federal Government over the Indians and control of their land indicate that as to them the liquor prohibition should be maintained after Statehood so far as consistent with the control of the State over its internal police.</p> <p>The liquor prohibition, so far as it concerns Indians, has always been deemed one of the peculiar responsibilities of the Federal Government.</p> <p>The provisions of § 2139, Rev. Stat., as amended by the acts of July 23, ■ 1892, and January 30,1897, so far as they related to the introduction of liquor into the Indian Territory from points outside of that Territory, but within what is now Oklahoma, have not been repealed, ’either expressly or by implication, by the Oklahoma Enabling Act.</p>

Judges: Pitney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.