Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 12/19/2019

United States v. Wright

Citations

  • 945 F.3d 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the date on which a petitioner should have discovered facts giving rise to his claim under § 2255(f)(4) is a “fact-specific issue[]”
  • observing that the date on which a petitioner should have discovered facts giving rise to his claim under § 2255(f)(4) is a “fact-specific issue[]”
  • noting the standard rule for tolling when no appeal is filed within fourteen days of the entry of judgment
  • conviction becomes final fourteen days after entry of judgment if no appeal filed, and time to file habeas petition runs one year later
  • conviction becomes final fourteen days after entry of judgment if no appeal filed, and time to file habeas petition runs one year later
  • conviction becomes final fourteen days after entry of judgment if no appeal filed, and time to file habeas petition runs one year later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.