United States v. Steven C. Willis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not err in refusing to conduct an in camera inspection where the defendant \failed to raise a colorable claim that the FBI 302s that he [sought were] 'statements' for purposes of the Jencks Act\
• finding no Brady violation where an undisclosed plea agreement “was a matter of public record, fully available to [defendant]” for ten months before trial
• allowing a district court to impose an obstruction-of-justice enhancement when the facts supporting it were in the record and the defendant had an opportunity to object
• not requiring trial judge to provide prior notice before imposing enhancement for obstruction of justice
• rejecting an identical double-counting argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).