Skip to main content
· 4/21/2000

United States v. Arthur Schuyler Ross, United States of America v. Arthur Schuyler Ross, Also Known as John Ross

Citations

  • 210 F.3d 916
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7235
  • 2000 WL 427631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that wire fraud does not require proof of a precise dollar amount
  • downward departure from U.S.S.G. S 2S1.1 inappropriate where defendant led scheme to defraud investors and reinvested virtually all of the proceeds in the scheme
  • same rule adopted for 18 U.S.C. § 1956
  • same rule adopted for 18 U.S.C. § 1956

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Lay, Fagg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.