· 1/6/1992
United States v. William Anthony Pou, United States of America v. Joseph Michael Pou, United States of America v. Miguel Mondejar
Citations
- 953 F.2d 363
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 79
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Mere speculation that a government file may contain Brady material is not sufficient to require a remand for in camera inspection, much less reversal for a new trial.”
- “This preference for joint trials is not limited by any requirement that the quantum of evidence of each defendant’s culpability be quantitatively or qualitatively equivalent.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- connection present where firearms seen in the same apartment from which cocaine was distributed
- due process not violated by late disclosure of material
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fagg, Heaney, Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.