Skip to main content
· 1/6/1992

United States v. William Anthony Pou, United States of America v. Joseph Michael Pou, United States of America v. Miguel Mondejar

Citations

  • 953 F.2d 363
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Mere speculation that a government file may contain Brady material is not sufficient to require a remand for in camera inspection, much less reversal for a new trial.”
  • “This preference for joint trials is not limited by any requirement that the quantum of evidence of each defendant’s culpability be quantitatively or qualitatively equivalent.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • connection present where firearms seen in the same apartment from which cocaine was distributed
  • due process not violated by late disclosure of material

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fagg, Heaney, Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.