· 10/2/1996
United States v. Antwon A. Warfield, United States of America v. Brian M. Thomas
Citations
- 97 F.3d 1014
- 45 Fed. R. Serv. 1005
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25979
- 1996 WL 557343
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that 1 hour of jury deliberation after Allen instruction, “while somewhat expeditious,” does not raise an inference of coercion
- noting that using wire transfers is insufficient to establish concealment and explaining that government cannot turn money laundering statute into \money spending statute\
- noting that using wire transfers is insufficient to establish concealment and explaining that government cannot turn money laundering statute into “money spending statute”
- reciting four-part test and considering the similarity and prejudice of the challenged evidence in addition to its relevance
- reciting four-part test and considering the similarity and prejudice of the challenged evidence in addition to its relevance
- declining to recognize authority of court to grant immunity to a witness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMillian, Beam, Hansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.