Skip to main content
· 10/2/1996

United States v. Antwon A. Warfield, United States of America v. Brian M. Thomas

Citations

  • 97 F.3d 1014
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 1005
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25979
  • 1996 WL 557343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that 1 hour of jury deliberation after Allen instruction, “while somewhat expeditious,” does not raise an inference of coercion
  • noting that using wire transfers is insufficient to establish concealment and explaining that government cannot turn money laundering statute into \money spending statute\
  • noting that using wire transfers is insufficient to establish concealment and explaining that government cannot turn money laundering statute into “money spending statute”
  • reciting four-part test and considering the similarity and prejudice of the challenged evidence in addition to its relevance
  • reciting four-part test and considering the similarity and prejudice of the challenged evidence in addition to its relevance
  • declining to recognize authority of court to grant immunity to a witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Beam, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.