United States v. Carlyle Eustace Wong, A/K/A Carlyle Wong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “an adjustment that clearly applies to the conduct of an offense must be imposed unless the Guidelines exclude its applicability”
• applying doctrine of \expressio unius est exclusio alterius\
• addressing claim raised by one of three co-conspirators
• noting Commission's awareness of potential for \double counting\
• “[EJxpressio unius est exclusio alteri-us”
• \[E]xpressio unius est exclusio alterius.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).