Skip to main content
· 11/2/1989

Robert Reutter v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary

Citations

  • 888 F.2d 578
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16479
  • 1989 WL 129745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the state must disclose evidence of the witness’s impending commutation hearing notwithstanding the district court’s finding that no agreement existed between the state and the witness
  • finding a reasonable probability of a different outcome where the jury was not informed of the existence of an impending commutation hearing of a key witness
  • finding a reasonable probability of a different outcome where the jury was not informed of the existence of an impending commutation hearing of a key witness
  • finding a reasonable probability of a different outcome where the jury was not informed of the existence of an impending commutation hearing of a key witness
  • “Our conclusion does not depend on a finding of either an express or an implied agreement ... ”
  • \Our conclusion does not depend on a finding of either an express or an implied agreement . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Bowman, Dumbauld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.