United States v. Fernandez-Cabrera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding that a judge's explanation need not be \precise to the point of pedantry\
• noting that a judge’s explanation need not be “precise to the point of pedantry”
• finding that the waiver-of-appeal provision did not prevent defendant's appeal where the court did not follow the parties' joint recommendation and the waiver-of-appeal provision was conditional on the court sentencing the defendant according to the parties' joint recommendation
• explaining that \unobjected-to '[f]acts contained in a presentence report ordinarily are considered reliable evidence for sentencing purposes'\ (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Morillo, 8 F.3d 864, 872 (1st Cir. 1993))
• finding that the waiver-of-appeal provision did not prevent defendant’s appeal where the court did not follow the parties’ joint recommendation and the waiver-of-appeal provision was conditional on the court sentencing the defendant according to the parties’ joint recommendation
• finding that the waiver-of- appeal provision did not prevent defendant's appeal where the court did not follow the parties' joint recommendation and the waiver-of- appeal provision was conditional on the court sentencing the defendant according to the parties' joint recommendation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).