Ramon Ramos Lugo v. Miguel Gimenez Munoz, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between evidence within the prosecution’s control and knowledge and that which is not
• claim that government withheld information that a court in another case had ordered a psychiatric evaluation of the prosecution’s main witness
• “Since the information at issue here was available to the defense attorney through diligent discovery, we find that the prosecutor’s omission was not of sufficient significance to result in the denial of the defendant’s right to a fair trial” (internal quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).