United States v. Andre Lamont Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting district court has discretion to allow law enforcement officers to testify as experts concerning drag-related activities likely to be unfamiliar to most jurors
• noting district court has discretion to allow law enforcement officers to testify as experts concerning drug-related activities likely to be unfamiliar to most jurors
• noting district court has discretion to allow law enforcement officers to testify as experts concerning drug-related activities likely to be unfamiliar to most jurors
• “We are troubled, however, with the portion of [the witness’] testimony which explained that an informant identified [the defendant] as a person [committing the crime].”
• no substantial impact when court instructed jury it was not bound by expert’s opinion
• no substantial impact when court instructed jury it was not bound by expert’s opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).