Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eighth Circuit· 4/7/1997

United States v. Andre Lamont Brown

Citations

  • 110 F.3d 605
  • 46 Fed. R. Serv. 1090
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6452
  • 1997 WL 157524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting district court has discretion to allow law enforcement officers to testify as experts concerning drag-related activities likely to be unfamiliar to most jurors
  • noting district court has discretion to allow law enforcement officers to testify as experts concerning drug-related activities likely to be unfamiliar to most jurors
  • noting district court has discretion to allow law enforcement officers to testify as experts concerning drug-related activities likely to be unfamiliar to most jurors
  • “We are troubled, however, with the portion of [the witness’] testimony which explained that an informant identified [the defendant] as a person [committing the crime].”
  • no substantial impact when court instructed jury it was not bound by expert’s opinion
  • no substantial impact when court instructed jury it was not bound by expert’s opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Gibson, Magill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Andre Lamont Brown

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.