United States v. Darrell Wimberly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting prior bad act evidence that occurred thirteen years prior to charge when evidence was highly reliable and relevant to credibility
• admitting prior bad act evidence that occurred thirteen years prior to charge when evidence was highly reliable and relevant to credibility
• allowing questions about other acts of molestation to challenge the defendant's credibility under Rule 404(b)
• highlighting the government’s reliance on the witness’s statements and potential impairment to a theory of defense as considerations in harmless error analysis
• allowing 13-year gap when sexual molestation crimes were “virtu- No. 07-2931 11 ally identical”
• “Prior 16 No. 16-2269 inconsistent statements are admissible even though the witness admits making the prior inconsistency.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).