Skip to main content
· 7/18/2001

United States v. Acencion Manjarrez, Also Known as Phil, Also Known as Felipe

Citations

  • 258 F.3d 618
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15990
  • 2001 WL 804118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant is not entitled to a specific instruction so long as, “considering the instructions as a whole, the jury was adequately instructed upon his theory of defense”
  • holding that a defendant is not entitled to a specific instruction so long as, “considering the instructions as a whole, the jury was adequately instructed upon his theory of defense”
  • holding that “careful and straight- forward explanations of the degree of knowledge and intent that the government must prove,” in addition to an “ostrich instruction,” was sufficient to apprise the jury of the good faith theory of defense
  • “defendant’s waiver of the right [to testify] must be knowing and intelligent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.