United States v. Lila D. Hanson, Also Known as Diane Hanson, and Keyte Hanson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \An out of court statement that is offered to show its effect on the hearer's state of mind is not hearsay.\
• \An out of court statement that is offered to show its effect on the hearer's state of mind is not hearsay.\
• “An out of court statement that is offered to show its effect on the hearer’s state of mind is not hearsay.”
• “An out of court statement that is offered to show its effect on the hearer’s state of mind is not hearsay.”
• hearsay exclusion of witness’s statement to defendants that they were not required to make disclosure of income for tax purposes was error since offered to show effect on defendants and thus, was not hearsay
• statement to defendant that he was not required to make disclosure was not hearsay because it was offered to show basis of his belief that disclosure not required, regardless of whether statement was true

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).