Seventh Circuit· 3/4/1997

United States v. Robert Salerno

Citations

108 F.3d 730
46 Fed. R. Serv. 778
1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3791
1997 WL 91900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

refusing to suppress the government’s expert evidence because “[f]rom the record, it does not appear that the defendant ever requested any expert discovery material, as Rule 16 required him to do”
“ ‘Prejudice’ is not caused by allowing the Government properly to strengthen its case, but rather by delays intended to hamper defendant’s ability to present his defense.”
“[A]s long as the district court is evenhanded in its evidentiary rulings, [it] has wide discretion in determining whether an exhibit will be allowed to go into the jury deliberation room.”
defendant’s objection to evidence indicating knowledge of potential need for limiting instruction, combined with overt acceptance of court’s final jury instruction without a limiting instruction, demonstrated that defendant “intentionally relinquished his known right”
United States v. Tedesco, 726 F.2d 1216, 1221 (7th Cir. 1984)
judgment must be \valid and final\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Ripple, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.