United States v. Marvin Berkowitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that it is not the Court’s job to construct the parties’ arguments for them
• holding that “perfunctory and undeveloped arguments” are forfeited on appeal
• stating that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived
• finding that “[w]e have repeatedly made clear that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived (even where those arguments raise constitutional issues).”
• holding that perfunctory and underdeveloped arguments are waived
• holding that perfunctory and underdeveloped arguments are waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).