United States v. Martin F. Hogan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that inconsistencies affect the weight, not the admissibility, of evidence presented at trial
• “If the evidence would have been admissible on either count, the defendant cannot claim that he was prejudiced by joinder.”
• the out-of-court declarant's statements were too vague and speculative to infer immediate action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).