United States v. Hurn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of a 10-year-old drug conviction was properly admit- ted to show intent in a prosecution for possession with intent to distribute
• 10-year-old drug conviction relevant to intent when defendant claimed he was an innocent bystander to cocaine distribution
• “Hurn has not convinced us that his sentence is an exception to the general rule that a Guidelines sentence is reasonable.”
• “A prior conviction is also relevant when the defendant concedes being in the vicinity of drug activity but argues that he was a ‘clueless bystander.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).