· 5/1/1998
Charles COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.J. KIBORT and Educational Therapy Center, Defendants-Appellants
Citations
- 143 F.3d 331
- 49 Fed. R. Serv. 330
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8647
- 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,352
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an error is not harmless when \a significant chance exists\ that the error \affected the out come of the trial\
- stating that hospital bills were inadmissible because there was no testimony as to the hospitalâs regular business practice in maintaining billing records
- noting that “[a] plaintiff cannot state a claim against a defendant by including the defendant’s name in the caption.”
- stating that an error is not harmless when \a significant chance exists\ that the error \affected the out come of the trial\
- explaining that we will “overturn a jury verdict for the plaintiff only if we conclude that no ra- tional jury could have found for the plaintiff”
- explaining that we will “overturn a jury verdict for the plaintiff only if we conclude that no ra- tional jury could have found for the plaintiff”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.