Skip to main content
· 5/1/1998

Charles COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.J. KIBORT and Educational Therapy Center, Defendants-Appellants

Citations

  • 143 F.3d 331
  • 49 Fed. R. Serv. 330
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8647
  • 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an error is not harmless when \a significant chance exists\ that the error \affected the out come of the trial\
  • stating that hospital bills were inadmissible because there was no testimony as to the hospital’s regular business practice in maintaining billing records
  • noting that “[a] plaintiff cannot state a claim against a defendant by including the defendant’s name in the caption.”
  • stating that an error is not harmless when \a significant chance exists\ that the error \affected the out come of the trial\
  • explaining that we will “overturn a jury verdict for the plaintiff only if we conclude that no ra- tional jury could have found for the plaintiff”
  • explaining that we will “overturn a jury verdict for the plaintiff only if we conclude that no ra- tional jury could have found for the plaintiff”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.