United States v. William A. Beith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that use of a prior conviction for more than one purpose is not prohibited
• approving district court’s consideration of rele- vant conduct to which the defendant admitted when determining which offense guideline most appropriately reflected the scope of the criminal activity
• factual findings under Sentencing Guidelines continue to be reviewed for clear error after United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005)
• “Unfortunately, family discord is common among victims [of the Mann Act] . . . . A finding of family problems, therefore, is not sufficient to support this enhancement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).