Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/26/2003

Trevino v. State

Citations

100 S.W.3d 232
2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 43
2003 WL 515978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that, depending on the facts, there could be evidence that was not discredited by the rejection of self-defense which supports a claim of sudden passion
concluding that omission of sudden passion instruction from punishment- phase jury charge was harmful although jury rejected self-defense at guilt- innocence phase
recognizing that, depending on the facts, there could be evidence that was not discredited by the rejection of self-defense which supports a claim of sudden passion
recognizing that, depending on the facts, there could be evidence that was not discredited by the rejection of self- defense which supports a claim of sudden passion
holding that some evidence of sudden passion consisted of the defendant “freaking out,” “scared and panicked,” “crying and shaking,” “pacing,” “consistently upset and crying,” “sounded distressed,” and “looked past” the investigator
holding that some evidence of sudden passion consisted of the defendant “freaking out,” “scared and panicked,” “crying and shaking,” “pacing,” “consistently upset and crying,” “sounded distressed,” and “looked past” the investigator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

224 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.