Skip to main content

Bufkin v. State

Citations

  • 179 S.W.3d 166
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 8750
  • 2005 WL 2675004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “excited utterance” exception applied because complainant was “extremely agitated when officers arrived at the scene ... [and] so upset that officers initially could not understand her”
  • concluding “excited utterance” exception applied because complainant was “extremely agitated when officers arrived at the scene . . . [and] so upset that officers initially could not understand her”
  • “As the trier-of-fact, the jury is the sole judge of the credibility of the witnesses and is free to -believe or disbelieve all, part, or none of any'witnesses] testimony.”
  • excited utterance exception applied because complainant was “extremely agitated when officers arrived at the scene . . . [and] so upset that officers initially could not understand her”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Harvey Hudson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.