Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 851 S.W.2d 282
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 56
  • 1993 WL 62241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any error in not submitting fact issue of safeness to jury was not egregious harm where safeness was not even incidental theory of defense and where error had minimal impact on appellant's trial
  • holding no egregious harm resulted where charge error affected issue that “was not a hotly- contested issue at trial” and thus “had minimal impact on appellant’s trial”
  • construing \safe place\ mitigating factor under the old law to be a defensive issue
  • taking guidance from § 2.03(e) to treat the “safe place’’ issue like a defense, but at the punishment stage of trial
  • taking guidance from § 2.03(e) in determining that the safe-place punishment-mitigation issue for the offense of aggravated kidnapping should be treated like a defense for burden-of-proof purposes
  • construing “safe place” mitigating factor under the old law to be a defensive issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.