Rayme v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reasonable doubt instruction was not required when extraneous acts evidence was not introduced, used, or referred to during punishment phase
• holding that when no evidence in record as to why trial counsel failed to object to victim impact testimony, appellant had not overcome strong presumption that conduct fell within wide range of reasonable professional assistance and might be considered sound trial strategy
• explaining appellate courts duty in Anders cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).