Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 2/6/2006

Treppel v. Biovail Corp.

Citations

  • 233 F.R.D. 363
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4407
  • 2006 WL 278170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “diligent search” might include “identifying key employees and reviewing any of their files that are likely to be relevant”
  • ordering Defendant to “provide the Plaintiff with a detailed explanation of the search protocol it implements.”
  • ordering Defendant to “provide the Plaintiff with a detailed explanation of the search protocol it implements.”
  • “Under Chapadeau, the evaluation of a defendant’s level of fault— whether its conduct in publishing defamatory statements was grossly irresponsible—is an objective determination.”
  • “Likewise, it is difficult to evaluate the injury that might be caused by the destruction of evidence without yet knowing the content of that evidence.”
  • “Defendants who have been dismissed with prejudice from a case need no longer respond to discovery requests served upon them when they were parties to the litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.