John B. v. Goetz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the obligation runs first to counsel, who then has a duty to advise and explain to the client”
• noting that “[d]eleted information in a party’s computer’s backup tapes is as discoverable as electronic documents in current use,” though simultaneously observing that these emails may in fact be presently maintained “as replicant data, archival data or residual data”
• granting motion to compel production of DCS files where minor plaintiffs demonstrated need to validate statistical data in their class action against DCS
• “Defendants must prove an agreement among its members to share information arising out of a common legal interest in litigation.”
• “The Court instructed defense counsel that for any documents subject to a claim of privilege, those documents should be filed under seal for an in camera inspection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. PFIZER INC.
  M.D. Tennessee· 2010-02-19· cited 27×
• United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2015-02-20· cited 24×
• Genesco, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc.
  M.D. Tennessee· 2014-03-10· cited 11×
• Webster v. Hennepin Cnty.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-04-18· cited 7×
• In re Haynes
  E.D. Tennessee· 2017-08-11· cited 6×
• Edgar County Watchdogs v. Joliet Township
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2023-02-23· cited 5×
• Donna M. Green v. School Administrative Unit 55 & a.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-04-19· cited 4×
• Genesco, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc.
  M.D. Tennessee· 2014-01-17
• Victor Valley Union High School Dist. v. Super. Ct.
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-12-22
• Victor Valley Union High School Dist. v. Super. Ct.
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-05-24

Cites

126 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Hickman v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
• United States v. Nixon
  Supreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
• Upjohn Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
• Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-19· cited 2,321×
• Fisher v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 2,033×
• Arizona v. California
  Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 1,909×
• Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers
  Supreme Court· 1958-06-16· cited 1,195×
• Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail
  Supreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,152×
• Jaffee v. Redmond
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 915×
• Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Cleveland
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 850×
• University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  Supreme Court· 1990-01-09· cited 608×
• United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation
  D. Massachusetts· 1950-03-10· cited 503×
• Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1992-09-04· cited 380×
• Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC
  S.D. New York· 2003-10-22· cited 362×
• Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-01-18· cited 333×
• Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. Colton
  Second Circuit· 1962-07-30· cited 322×
• In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1984-03-27· cited 302×
• United States v. Robert McPartlin
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-04-23· cited 271×
• First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
  First Circuit· 2002-10-10· cited 230×
• United States v. Martin Schwimmer
  Second Circuit· 1989-12-27· cited 221×