McPeek v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiff had not demonstrated the requisite credibility as he had falsely stated on his certifications the date and price per share about his apparent one and only class period transaction
• “[T]he presence of an arguable defense is sufficient to find atypicality.” (emphasis added)
• applying the same Fifth Circuit test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).