Skip to main content
· 12/19/1966

Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Harang

Citations

  • 262 F. Supp. 39
  • 10 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 964
  • 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying a motion to join a party under Rule 19(a)(1)(B) where that party had not claimed an interest in the action
  • denying the plaintiff’s motion for an injunction against the defendant to preserve evidence
  • error to enjoin destruction of documents subject to production

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rubin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.