Paula A. Konikoff v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no doubt that “allegedly improper valuation of substantial investments made by a publicly held company” were a matter of public concern
• noting that common-law malice “focuses on the defendant’s attitude toward the plaintiff”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).