Mahar v. US XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff may have established liability based on defendant’s violation of VTL provision
• finding that defendant “was already on notice that [the plaintiff] may have suffered serious injuries from the accident, and because of the developing nature. of those injuries, the court grants the Mahars’ motion to amend their complaint to increase the ad damnum clause.”
• “Where a party loses use of its vehicle as the result of an accident, it may be entitled to recover damages for loss of use.” (emphasis added)
• “Leave to amend may be denied where the [plaintiff] appears to be raising a new claim in anticipation of an adverse ruling or to counteract a motion for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).