Zubulake v. UBS WARBURG LLC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony of other employees about similar acts of discrimination 1s relevant to proving discriminatory intent
• “Placing the five previous decisions in this case before the jury would serve no legitimate purpose. The jurors will be told all they need to know through the evidence admitted at trial.”
• “‘As a general rule, the testimony of other employees about their treatment by the defendant is relevant to the issue of the employer’s discriminatory intent.””

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).