United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash Babcock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court order compelling production of discovery for a proceeding before an administrative agency was final because there was no “further judicial inquiry” for the court (quoting Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 330 (1940)
• citing, inter alia, United States v. Ryan, 402 U.S. 530, 532, 91 S.Ct. 1580, 29 L.Ed.2d 85 (1971)
• noting exception to contempt requirement as basis for appellate jurisdiction in context of third party subpoena issued in administrative investigation
• noting exception to contempt requirement as basis for appellate jurisdiction in context of third party subpoena issued in administrative investigation
• enforcing subpoena issued by Nuclear Regulatory Commission over objection that the subject matter of the agency’s investigation was reserved by law for the Department of Labor
• rejecting attorney-client and work product claims where the party claiming those privileges failed to establish the essential elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).