S.D. New York· 4/2/2008
Treppel v. Biovail Corp.
Citations
- 249 F.R.D. 111
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25867
- 2008 WL 866594
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the failure to preserve backup tapes after December 2003 was sufficient to constitute gross negligence or recklessness
- holding that the plaintiff failed to establish relevance where he was “unable to demonstrate that any single document, or even any type of document, that was destroyed would have been favorable to him”
- finding adverse inference instruction inappropriate where “the only evidence that [the] [p]laintiff has adduced suggesting that the unproduced discovery would be unfavorable to [the] [d]efendants is the non- production itself” (citation, alteration, and quotation marks omitted)
- “[I]t is ... clear that [defendant] should have retained the monthly backup tapes of the relevant servers from the previous year, since these were quite likely to contain files that were later deleted”
- “[O]nce a party reasonably anticipates litigation, it must suspend its routine document retention/destruction policy and put in place a ‘litigation hold’ to ensure the preservation of relevant documents.”
- generalized assertions that missing evidence is relevant is insufficient to establish relevancy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Francis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.D. Maryland· 2010-09-09· cited 175×
- Goodman v. Praxair Services, Inc.D. Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 142×
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCS.D. New York· 2010-01-15· cited 103×
- Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc. v. Dongbu Hannong Chemical Co.S.D. New York· 2011-01-14· cited 65×
- Passlogix, Inc. v. 2FA TECHNOLOGY, LLCS.D. New York· 2010-04-27· cited 54×
- Orbit One Communications, Inc. v. Numerex Corp.S.D. New York· 2010-10-26· cited 53×
- Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaS.D. New York· 2015-09-29· cited 48×
- Laboratory Corp. of America v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2013-01-14· cited 37×
- Taylor v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2013-09-04· cited 34×
- Hawley v. Mphasis Corp.S.D. New York· 2014-07-22· cited 33×
- Green v. McClendonS.D. New York· 2009-08-13· cited 31×
- In re Pfizer Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2013-01-08· cited 24×
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.S.D. New York· 2015-02-20· cited 24×
- Dorchester Financial Holdings Corp. v. Banco BRJ S.A.S.D. New York· 2014-12-15· cited 22×
- Deanda v. HicksS.D. New York· 2015-09-30· cited 20×
- Adorno v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyS.D. New York· 2009-03-31· cited 20×
- Harkabi v. Sandisk Corp.S.D. New York· 2010-08-23· cited 16×
- Scalera v. Electrograph Systems, Inc.E.D. New York· 2009-09-29· cited 15×
- Eka v. Brookdale Hospital Medical CenterE.D. New York· 2017-03-29· cited 9×
- Mastr Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2006-OA2 v. UBS Real Estate Securities Inc.S.D. New York· 2013-10-23· cited 9×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationSecond Circuit· 2001-04-20· cited 628×
- Robert F. Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell, Board of Education, Body Corporate Cromwell Board of Education Body CorporateSecond Circuit· 2001-03-15· cited 599×
- Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital CorpSecond Circuit· 2002-09-26· cited 503×
- West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Second Circuit· 1999-02-12· cited 379×
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCS.D. New York· 2003-10-22· cited 362×
- Kronisch v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1998-07-09· cited 241×
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCS.D. New York· 2004-07-20· cited 145×
- Turner v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.S.D. New York· 1991-09-27· cited 140×
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Local 100, Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International UnionS.D. New York· 2003-01-28· cited 62×
- Treppel v. Biovail Corp.S.D. New York· 2006-02-06· cited 33×
- In re WRT Energy Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2007-09-28· cited 24×
- Doe v. Norwalk Community CollegeD. Connecticut· 2007-07-16· cited 14×
- Klezmer v. BuynakE.D. New York· 2005-01-21· cited 9×
- Cortes v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.D. Connecticut· 2006-10-10· cited 3×
Other cases named Treppel v. Biovail Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.