Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/28/2001

State v. Weber

Citations

172 Or. App. 704
19 P.3d 378
2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reasoning that “an assertion not made by a person but by a machine . . . is not hearsay”
“Because the citation was facially sufficient, the court properly denied the demurrer.” (footnote omitted; emphasis added)
notation of speed on radar photograph “was generated by a machine, and not made by a person,” therefore, it “is an assertion not made by a person” and is not hearsay
“[W]e are unaware of any Oregon authority by which a pretrial ‘motion to dismiss’ can be employed to challenge the sufficiency of the state’s anticipated proof of a charge.”
“[W]e are unaware of any Oregon authority by which a pretrial ‘motion to dismiss’ can be employed to challenge the sufficiency of the state’s anticipated proof of a charge.”
“[W]e are unaware of any Oregon authority by which a pretrial motion * * * can be employed to challenge the sufficiency of the state’s anticipated proof of a charge.” (Internal quotations marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Lipscomb, Tempore, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.