Skip to main content
· 6/22/1988

State v. Dike

Citations

  • 756 P.2d 657
  • 91 Or. App. 542
  • 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 1150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing whether loss of witnesses and evidence prejudiced defendant’s right to a fair trial
  • where the record did not show that the defendant was prejudiced because witnesses’ testimony had changed, that he was unable to locate exculpatory witnesses, or that the district attorney intentionally delayed the matter, the defendant’s due process rights were not violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joseph, Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.