· 6/22/1988
State v. Dike
Citations
- 756 P.2d 657
- 91 Or. App. 542
- 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 1150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing whether loss of witnesses and evidence prejudiced defendant’s right to a fair trial
- where the record did not show that the defendant was prejudiced because witnesses’ testimony had changed, that he was unable to locate exculpatory witnesses, or that the district attorney intentionally delayed the matter, the defendant’s due process rights were not violated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joseph, Van Hoomissen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.