Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/15/2000
State v. Nelson
Citations
- 999 P.2d 1161
- 166 Or. App. 189
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing elements of a vindictive prosecution claim and requiring a defendant to offer objective proof of actual vindictiveness
- discussing Supreme Court cases and concluding that, in a pretrial setting, vindictive prosecution does not arise when a prosecutor brings charges “in response” to a defendant’s exercise of a constitutional right; the prosecutor must act with a retaliatory or punitive motive
- reviewing dismissal for due process violation for errors of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Wollheim, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28· cited 19×
- State v. KoenigCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-27· cited 5×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-01-17· cited 2×
- State v. WellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-30· cited 1×
- State v. KadderlyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-09-05· cited 1×
- State v. WeverCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 2,683×
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 1,945×
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 1,581×
- State v. HallingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-12-14· cited 4×
- States v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.