City of Lavergne v. Abass I. Gure
Syllabus
A circuit court found that a motorist violated the city's ordinance prohibiting speeding. On appeal, the motorist argues that the circuit court should have granted his motion to dismiss. He also argues that the court improperly excluded evidence from Google Maps showing his speed and that the evidence preponderates against the finding that he was speeding. Although the court erred in excluding the Google Maps evidence, we affirm.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- it is an “established proposition that a question about the existence of a contract is a question that must be decided by the finder of facts”
- agreement unenforceable where plaintiffs did not prove amount of funds committed to investment, expected duration of investment, applicability of agreement to properties and investors not identified or effective date of agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.