Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/28/1992
State v. Reed
Citations
- 840 P.2d 723
- 116 Or. App. 58
- 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1963
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- error for court to sustain defendant’s demurrer on the basis of facts not alleged in the complaint
- error for court to sustain defendant’s demurrer on the basis of facts not alleged in the complaint
- error for court to sustain defendant's demurrer on the basis of facts not alleged in the complaint
- it is error for the court to sustain a demurrer on the basis of facts not alleged in the charging instrument
- “It was error for the trial court to consider facts that are not alleged in the complaint and to sustain defendant’s demur- rer on that basis.”
- “It was error for the trial court to consider facts that are not alleged in the complaint and to sustain defendant’s demur- rer on that basis.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buttler, Rossman, De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28· cited 19×
- State v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-29· cited 12×
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-27· cited 7×
- State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-07· cited 1×
- State v. WeverCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28
- State v. SarriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-09-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.