Oregon Supreme Court· 1/8/1985

State v. Rainey

Citations

693 P.2d 635
298 Or. 459
1985 Ore. LEXIS 930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that, in the case of presumptions, “it is not the label given * * * but the effect upon the burden of proof that is significant”
noting that, in the case of presump- tions, “it is not the label given * * * but the effect upon the burden of proof that is significant”
articulating circumstances in which an inferred fact may be used to establish an element of the offense
articulating circumstances in which an inferred fact may be used to establish an element of the offense
explaining the impact of presumptions as applied to the accused in criminal cases
in criminal case, issue of improper use of an evidentiary presumption raised by challenge to jury instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lent, Carson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Rainey

52 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.