State v. Huffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissal of complaint inappropriate remedy when officer exceeded his authority in serving summons outside his jurisdiction
• under traditional “bailiwick” rule, “police officers are authorized only to act within the boundaries of the governmental unit employing them”
• dismissal of complaint inappropriate remedy when officer exceeded his authority in serving summons outside his jurisdiction
• dismissal inappropriate remedy when officer exceeded his authority in serving summons outside his jurisdiction
• dismissal inappropriate remedy when officer exceeded his authority in serving summons outside his jurisdiction
• dismissal inappropriate remedy when officer exceeded his authority in serving summons outside his jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Weber
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28· cited 19×
• State v. Berg
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-10-27· cited 7×
• State v. Calderon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-03-07· cited 6×
• State v. Koenig
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-27· cited 5×
• State v. Keller
  Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-15· cited 2×
• State v. Wever
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28
• State v. Sarria
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-09-25

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hickmann
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-10-16· cited 89×
• State v. Vanbarg
  Toledo Municipal Court· 1975-04-08· cited 3×