Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/27/1996
State v. Barker
Citations
- 914 P.2d 11
- 140 Or. App. 82
- 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 417
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Defendant’s argument about what he expects the state to present at trial is premature and does not provide a basis for sustaining a demurrer.”
- \Defendant's argument about what he expects the state to present at trial is premature and does not provide a basis for sustaining a demurrer.\
- “Defendant’s argument about what he expects the state to present at trial is premature and does not provide a basis for sustaining a demurrer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riggs, Landau, Leeson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.